禁閉島影評

知識點：《禁閉島影評》 收集：褚蠢忌 編輯：桃花姐
本知識點包括：1、禁閉島到底講什么 2、禁閉島到底想表達什么？ 3、禁閉島的影片評價 4、禁閉島的劇情 5、求一篇原創(chuàng) 禁閉島 的觀后感 。

《禁閉島影評》相關(guān)知識

Shutter Island.A film that will divide the film community.A film that will leave many upset,and hating it.A film that has already completely split the critics.A movie that messes with you.And no one likes to be messed with.And that is exactly where it exceeds.Think I'm contradicting myself?

Shutter Island is one of the most well crafted psychological thrillers to come by since Silence Of The Lambs.And it is no coincidence both were brilliantly written novels.Shutter Island is adapted by a book written by Dennis Lehane (wrote gone baby,gone and mystic river).It is a book filled with twists and turns,that will leave the reader dizzy.And,that is what it's film counterpart does to the fullest.Martin Scorsese helms the director chair,in a movie where he is more free than any before.This is Scorsese at his most unrestrained.

Marty takes what he has learned from the great films of the past and puts it into his.The master of suspense Alfred Hitchcock's influence is everywhere you look in this film.And it is no wonder,considering Scorsese even showed one of his greatest works to the crew:Vertigo.And many of those ideas are present in Shutter Island; the cliff scenes scream Hitchcock.This is a film that creeps and crawls,and is filled with dark corners.And it is all heightened by the coming storm that looms over the island.This is classic film noir.

The story follows Teddy,a federal Marshall,and his partner Chuck (Played by DiCaprio and Ruffulo).They go to this mysterious island enveloped in fog to investigate an escape.From these opening scenes,Marty has set up a dark and creepy premise.

Almost the whole movie incorporates this story as Teddy desperately tries to find the truths he seeks.Teddy is shown as a scared man; a man of war and violence as portrayed in various flashbacks.These will go on to be increasingly important as the story progresses.We follow Teddy on his quest,through every dark corridor and perilous confrontations.Slowly,we are given pieces to the puzzle,but the audience does not even realize it.For we,like Teddy,are blind.For the moment at least.It is because of this that the thrilling conclusion will leave many blindsided.But,you see,that is where this thriller becomes something more.We as the audience are put in Teddy's shoes,and we feel all the things he feels.It is a complete assault on the senses,and it works beautifully.

This is a film you must watch carefully.That is another thing that sets this apart,it is a horror film that makes you actually think.In this day and age,I'm not surprised some found it terrible esp.after their brains have been turned to mush by these new gore filled horror films.Scorsese's ultimate goal here is to wake you up.And trust me,you probably wont like it.

This is also a film I would recommend seeing a second time.In fact,it is even better the second time.All those pieces of that puzzle you didn't catch the first time,you will the second.You see,we as the audience are first put in the shoes of Teddy.The second?Well,without giving too much away,lets just say you are put in someones else's shoes entirely during the second viewing.

Shutter Island.A film that will make you question your own sanity.A film that will leave you breathless.A film that has re-ignited the thriller genre.A film that will leave you,and the main character,searching for answers.

知識拓展：

1： 急需4篇英文電影影評（影評要用英文寫的額）,最好是懸疑片的,如致命id,禁閉島等開頭簡要介紹一下內(nèi)容,之后開始談?wù)劯惺?最好能分析下電影給人的啟發(fā)（大概300字左右每篇）.寫完后發(fā)至h

知識要點歸納：

已發(fā)送~FIGHT FOR HEALTH.

2： 【電影教父的觀后感要英文的1000字左右不要在線翻譯】

知識要點歸納：

User Comments (Comment on this title)

70 out of 112 people found the following comment useful:-

Initially, I wasn't a fan... but then I realised, 14 October 2006

Author: mattrochman from Australia

This is a masterpiece. A timeless masterpiece. Initially, I didn't like this film all that much - I found it rather over-hyped and boring. This was until the advent of DVD, which gave me the feature I needed for this sort of film: subtitles. Once I switched them on and heard (read) every last word of Brando's ramblings and other characters ramblings, I grew a true appreciation for this epic.

To make a true epic, you need all of three following ingredients working in near perfect harmony. For screenwriters who come across this, take the following pointers on board: 1) Contrasting Characters: Good films have some character distinction, but most fall rather flat because the core of each character is the same.

Of course, there are exceptions to rule (ie... where you want mono-tonal characters... aka matrix; or where you want outlandish contrasts... aka The Fifth Element), but ultimately, this is what makes films deep, meaningful and grand. Consider the contrasts between the Don's children. Michael is rather cool, rational and collected, whereas Sonny is more hot-headed, spontaneous and simple minded. But simply having these contrasts is not nearly enough. What you really need to do is to develop these characters - place them in situations - and then dwell on how their character impacts on the situation they're put in. The Godfather is a terrific example of how to pull this off. While many try to do this in screenplays, most lose the plot and create character obscurities that stretch credibility.

2) Transformation: The central character(s) must undergo a transformation, resulting in them being almost unrecognizable by the end of the film. By putting them into situations, the character's character must not only influence the outcome of the situation; it must also have a lasting impact on the character. Consider Michael at the wedding and compare that to the Michael we see at the end of the film. Again, many films try, but most fail because they come up with unreal (literally, not praisingly) or simply moronic transformations (eg, Wall Street).

3) Patience: Men in Black 2 was an astounding film for one simple reason - it was an entire film squashed into about 70 minutes. It was not much longer than an episode of ER or Buffy. I certainly hope the new goal of Hollywood isn't to make films as short as possible.

All the great ones spend time - time developing characters, family life, growth, patience with the story telling in general. This is the key (provided that the story isn't mind-numbingly boring). Dances with Wolves, Heat.. and so on are very patient but top-class films. While studios may be lukewarm on the idea of longer films, they are worth it if you have a ripper story to base it on.

I feel that this film has not dated all that much and has tremendous re-watch-ability.

3： 求《珍珠港》1000字英文觀后感求《珍珠港》電影1000字英文觀后感,

知識要點歸納：

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reproducing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor. Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers? Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an individual: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions.

猜你喜歡：

1：禁閉島到底講什么

提示：1954年，聯(lián)邦警官泰迪（萊昂納多·迪卡普里奧 Leonardo DiCaprio 飾）和搭檔查克（馬克·魯弗洛 Mark Ruffalo 飾）乘船來到波士頓附近的禁閉島精神病犯監(jiān)獄調(diào)查一樁離奇失蹤案。 手刃親生骨肉的女犯蕾切爾（艾米莉·莫迪默 Emily Mortimer 飾）從戒...

2：禁閉島到底想表達什么？

提示：心理驚悚片Shutter Island深入解析 這是一部讓人看了腦袋直疼的電影；這是一部顛覆了好萊塢模式的電影……這就是美國名導(dǎo)馬釘西科塞斯掌鏡、《泰坦尼克》男主角萊昂納多主演的心理驚悚片《禁閉島》(ShutterIsland)。只有智商150以上的人才能一口氣...

3：禁閉島的影片評價

提示： 《禁閉島》是一部上乘的心理驚悚電影，該片強調(diào)電影視聽手法的運用，通過鏡頭運用、聽覺效果等將影片的緊張恐怖氣氛烘托得恰到好處（《信息時報》評） 。《禁閉島》的氣氛營造，從片頭隨派拉蒙標志出現(xiàn)的第一個音符就已經(jīng)開始了。斯科塞斯如工...

4：禁閉島的劇情

提示：我認為這個解釋最為透徹 這么給你講一下劇情吧。 看完你就全明白了 LEONARDO所扮演的男主角，曾經(jīng)是一名參加過2戰(zhàn)的戰(zhàn)士，他曾經(jīng)親眼目睹過納粹集中營中，對于猶太人的種種暴行，從他的回憶中可以看出來，并且他也目睹了納粹集中營頭領(lǐng)由于笨拙...

5：求一篇原創(chuàng) 禁閉島 的觀后感

提示：首先我聲明，下文中出現(xiàn)的關(guān)于精神病的言論沒有對任何人的歧視，因為我覺得：所謂精神病人，只不過是不打算對這個紛雜的世界徹底妥協(xié)的人。 "REMEMBER US FOR WE TOO HAVE LIVED,LOVED AND LAUGHED"（記住，我們也曾活過，愛過，笑過）——《禁閉...